Rendered at 17:01:50 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
trjordan 1 hours ago [-]
I deeply love this idea of specialized LLMs for search. It's also extremely confusing to me how rough Google's entrance here is.
When I, a human, need an answer to anything moderately complex, it's unlikely that I get it on the first (pre-AI) round of google searching. Simple stuff, sure, but more likely I'll need to go 2-5 rounds. Maybe click a few links. Double-check my assumptions.
An LLM that can do that quickly seems like a slam dunk. I wonder what other problems benefit from that 10x-100x increase in context + 2-5 rounds with the LLM.
Waterluvian 47 minutes ago [-]
About 15 years ago I would sometimes spend hours on Google image search discovering childhood toys and filling in vague memories of locations or things. I tried this recently and it’s basically impossible. I actually get to the end of the search results in like 3 minutes and the quality is horrible now.
I think in a lot of ways Google peaked and is now on the decline into a profitable but much less relevant services company.
gwbas1c 49 minutes ago [-]
What kind of search do you mean?
For example, a couple of days ago I described a problem with my refrigerator's water dispenser to Google Gemini, and it told me exactly how to fix it. I then went looking for a video and fixed the thing in under 15 minutes. The only way that Gemini could have been better is if it linked to a video itself.
Do you mean search into less-well-known topics? Or something else?
gottagocode 58 minutes ago [-]
I know it can be a deep time sink, but I notice more and more how much deeper my understanding is of a certain problem/best-practice after developing the neuropathways involved in crawling between reddit, stack overflow, etc, to get to the proper solution. I love the instant answer from google ai, but I also notice an itch to purposefully force myself to ignore it when time allows.
__s 16 minutes ago [-]
ime google ai is wrong often enough that I'm still doing that to verify its results
At least validation seems faster than without, but you get what you pay for when it comes to llm intelligence
tolugenius 1 hours ago [-]
I guess someone who has used a search agent (or a dedicated subagent) can speak when I'd reach for a tool like this vs either just 1) a smaller general model or 2) a non-llm approach to the problem? Like it's interesting I'm just curious how a search agent compares to say a model with dedicated rag pipelines is that much different?
breadislove 1 hours ago [-]
the issue with smaller general models (see at the charts) are way behind the frontier models when it comes to search. we've found that there is huge uplift of having a fast dedicated model. from our perspective, having a very good index is the biggest lever and then having a specialised model.
tolugenius 17 minutes ago [-]
interesting, thanks for the reply.
moffkalast 19 minutes ago [-]
> performs best with Mixedbread Search, but it can work with any search backend
Bread-first search, is it?
andai 54 minutes ago [-]
Article should probably explain what "Mixedbread Search" is.
breadislove 47 minutes ago [-]
Mixedbread Search is a multimodal & multilingual search product, where you can upload any kind of data and make it searchable. Its powered by Wholembed [1] v3, a late interaction retrieval model.
I know everyone loves to hate on google but i find search overviews and asking gemini to search for things way faster than any alternative. I was curious about a development near me and asked literally that and gemini pulled court records in about 20 seconds
Anyway, back to this - it seems to be more like the AI equivalent of algolia than google
ChrisArchitect 1 hours ago [-]
Dunno about this branding/naming scheme - every time it comes up we have to double-check that it isn't some spoof/joke page
breadislove 1 hours ago [-]
there is full lore around the naming. i can guarantee you that we are pretty dedicated around our research and product.
andai 56 minutes ago [-]
An inside joke that confuses your target audience and makes you sound like a joke, is probably not what you want as your brand.
rafram 50 minutes ago [-]
The brand only needs to last until the Google acquihire.
levmiseri 25 minutes ago [-]
(FWIW I like the branding. Hugging Face doesn't seem to struggle because of its name either)
m_w_ 54 minutes ago [-]
lore does not make it a good or professional choice
cryo32 50 minutes ago [-]
Some days I have no idea what the fuck I am looking at.
When I, a human, need an answer to anything moderately complex, it's unlikely that I get it on the first (pre-AI) round of google searching. Simple stuff, sure, but more likely I'll need to go 2-5 rounds. Maybe click a few links. Double-check my assumptions.
An LLM that can do that quickly seems like a slam dunk. I wonder what other problems benefit from that 10x-100x increase in context + 2-5 rounds with the LLM.
I think in a lot of ways Google peaked and is now on the decline into a profitable but much less relevant services company.
For example, a couple of days ago I described a problem with my refrigerator's water dispenser to Google Gemini, and it told me exactly how to fix it. I then went looking for a video and fixed the thing in under 15 minutes. The only way that Gemini could have been better is if it linked to a video itself.
Do you mean search into less-well-known topics? Or something else?
At least validation seems faster than without, but you get what you pay for when it comes to llm intelligence
Bread-first search, is it?
[1]: https://www.mixedbread.com/blog/wholembed-v3
Anyway, back to this - it seems to be more like the AI equivalent of algolia than google